1The objects provision in s 7(1)(b) of the Fisheries Management Act 2007 (SA), including the principle of 'equitable distribution', does not impose discrete mandatory requirements whose non-fulfilment vitiates a quota allocation; it requires only that the Minister seek to further the statutory objects, informed by the various principles, with a degree of latitude as to how that objective is achieved.
2Where a statutory quota allocation methodology affords the decision-maker broad discretion, a contention that a different methodology would have been more equitable from a particular licence holder's perspective does not, without more, disclose jurisdictional error; considerations of pragmatism and practicality may limit the pursuit of perfect equity.
3Under r 256.5(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules 2020 (SA), the 'reasonable basis' threshold encompasses both the arguability of jurisdictional error and the prospect of overcoming discretionary barriers to relief, including delay, failure to pursue available statutory appeals, and prejudice to third parties whose entitlements may be affected.
