The Court refused the applicant leave to appeal against the Supreme Court's determination that the applicant had no duly appointed director and that forfeiture proceedings under s 70 of the Mining Act 1971 (SA) were not a 'claim' requiring leave under the DOCA, and against the ERD Court's consequent dismissal of the applicant's appeal as incompetent, finding the proposed grounds lacked sufficient prospects of success and impermissibly sought to raise new arguments not advanced below.
The full text is available to signed-in members.