1An order for an expedited appeal hearing will not be granted as a matter of course; the applicant must demonstrate a proper case for expedition warranting departure from the ordinary course of listings, having regard to the Court of Appeal's limited resources and long list.
2Even assuming reasonably arguable grounds of appeal exist, the strength of grounds alone does not support a case for urgency or expedition where final orders have already been made and the applicant has not sought a stay of those orders.
3Where a professional misconduct finding and sanctions are not 'pending' anything but are final orders already in effect, and the applicant has exhausted all avenues of appeal concerning the underlying finding, the contention that expedition is needed to prevent those orders from taking effect misunderstands the procedural position.
Case Details
Citation[2026] SASCA 75
CourtSASCA
JurisdictionSouth Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
