The Court held that significant delays in forensic testing of seized substances, combined with an applicant's caring responsibilities, available treatment supports, and the risk of pre-sentence custody exceeding any likely sentence, can collectively establish a compelling reason for bail on Schedule 2 drug trafficking charges. The judgment also reinforces that bare assertions in informant reports (e.g., that an accused cannot support themselves without drug trafficking income) unsupported by evidence will be given no weight and may attract judicial criticism and costs consequences.
The full text is available to signed-in members.