The Court granted bail on a Schedule 1 trafficking charge, holding that exceptional circumstances were established by a combination of factors: the prosecution case was not strong (DNA evidence on a reusable zip lock bag was susceptible to innocent explanations and the co-accused had taken sole responsibility), the applicant did not pose an unacceptable risk of endangering safety or obstructing justice, there was a real risk that time on remand would exceed any non-parole period given likely delay of 18–24 months to trial, and a substantial surety from the applicant's mother provided strong incentive for compliance. The Court emphasised that the absence of unacceptable risk factors is an important consideration weighing in favour of finding exceptional circumstances, and that a substantial surety alone, without the other factors, would not have been sufficient.
The full text is available to signed-in members.