The 'good arguable case' test applies to freezing orders against non-parties in Victoria, and evidence of serious dishonesty supporting the good arguable case may itself be sufficient to found an inference of risk of dissipation of assets without separate direct evidence of intended dissipation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.