The Supreme Court of Western Australia held that it has no jurisdiction to declare void or review first-instance decisions of the Federal Court, which as a superior court of record can authoritatively determine its own jurisdiction, with its orders binding until set aside on appeal or by constitutional writ under s 75(v) of the Constitution. The Court further held that the Trustees Act 1962 (WA), despite defining 'Court' as the Supreme Court, does not confer exclusive jurisdiction on that court over trust matters, because s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) picks up and applies State trust legislation in federal jurisdiction, following Edensor. The plaintiff's attempt to relitigate in the Supreme Court the same issue already determined by the Federal Court — whether funds in a bank account were trust property — was summarily dismissed as an abuse of process, applying the Sheraz line of authority on relitigation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.