1Dissatisfaction with adverse interlocutory rulings does not, without more, establish actual bias or give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias; such grievances are properly ventilated on appeal.
2A judge's indication that the same legal question will receive the same answer in a future application does not constitute prejudgment amounting to actual bias.
Case Details
Citation[2026] WASC 322
CourtWASC
JurisdictionWestern Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
