The case confirms that where a complainant's prior inconsistent statement to police can be placed before the jury through cross-examination of another witness, the absence of formal police records of that earlier interview does not necessarily deprive the accused of a fair trial so as to warrant a permanent stay. Inconsistencies in a complainant's evidence that do not go to critical issues are matters for the jury's assessment. Sentences of 10 years' imprisonment for rape of a child by a stepfather in a position of trust are within range.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.