A Longman warning is not required in every case of multiple sexual offences. The warning is directed at the specific mischief of long delay depriving the accused of the means of testing the complainant's allegations. Where the delay is relatively short (approximately two years) and the accused has not been deprived of the means of defence, the interests of justice do not require such a warning. The trial judge retains a discretion under s 61(2) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) to determine whether a warning is called for and in what form.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.