A history of repeated adjournment applications based on competing proceedings that do not eventuate as represented can constitute 'extraordinary circumstances' within Sali v SPC Ltd, justifying refusal of an adjournment even where the practical effect is to terminate proceedings. The right of the opposing party to have its case heard is a weighty consideration that can outweigh the adjournment applicant's interests. Minor procedural defaults by the opposing party (such as brief confusion over opposition to an adjournment, or failure to provide documents where the applicant did not follow up) do not necessarily warrant a lengthy adjournment.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.