Holland v R

[1999] WASCA 43

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Discount for guilty plea
4. › Early plea of guilty under fast track system
5. › Failure of sentencing judge to recognise early pleas
6. › Whether sentence should be reduced
7. › Sentencing Act 1995 (WA), s 8(4)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Totality
4. › Common elements across multiple offences
5. › Whether punishment for common element should be imposed only once
6. › Burglary with circumstance of aggravation where aggravating assault also charged separately
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Domestic violence
4. › Burglary of dwelling
5. › Being in dwelling without consent in circumstance of aggravation
6. › Assault as circumstance of aggravation
7. › Breach of violence restraining order

Quick Take

Where an offender enters early guilty pleas under the fast track system and the sentencing judge fails to make any allowance for those pleas, a 25% reduction may be appropriate. Where the same assault constitutes a common element across multiple charges (burglary with circumstance of aggravation, breach of restraining order, and assault), the sentences for the additional charges should be significantly reduced to avoid triple punishment for the same conduct.