When sentencing for a series of similar offences with concurrent sentences, the sentencing judge is entitled to fix the highest sentence at a level reflecting the total criminality of all offences, rather than sentencing each offence as if it stood alone. No clear sentencing pattern has emerged for sodomy offences under s 208 of the Criminal Code (Qld) involving complainants aged 14-17, making it difficult to establish manifest inadequacy on an Attorney-General's appeal. Substantial cooperation with authorities under s 13A of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) can justify a significant reduction from otherwise appropriate sentences.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.