A comprehensive comment on delay that identifies specific areas of disadvantage to the accused, but does not warn in terms of the 'dangerousness' of convicting on the complainant's evidence alone, is insufficient to satisfy the Longman warning requirement in cases of lengthy delay (approximately 20 years). Where the prosecution cross-examines on alleged lies and it is unclear whether they are relied upon for credibility or consciousness of guilt, the trial judge must require the prosecution to clarify the basis of reliance and direct accordingly, or at minimum give a direction preventing impermissible reasoning. The question whether a direction is required that acquittal on one count necessitates acquittal on all counts where the complainant is the sole witness was left open.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.