Where co-offenders are sentenced by different judges on inconsistent factual bases regarding their respective roles, the parity principle still applies but the court will examine whether mitigatory factors personal to each offender rationally explain any disparity. Individual sentences may be reduced for parity or manifest excess without necessarily reducing the total effective sentence, through variation of cumulation orders. Three months' imprisonment for mere possession of a very small quantity of cannabis is manifestly excessive.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 19 later cases that cite this judgment.
8 of the 19 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.