Where multiple counts on an indictment relate to separate and distinct sexual acts occurring on the same occasion, the jury is entitled to return different verdicts on each count, and an acquittal on one count is not logically inconsistent with a conviction on another where the acts differ in nature (e.g., simulated intercourse while clothed versus digital penetration). The qualitative difference between the acts, including their likely memorability to a young child, may provide a proper explanation for different verdicts.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.