A trial judge sitting alone has greater latitude to intervene in the examination of witnesses than a judge presiding over a jury trial. Where a prosecutor fails to adequately elicit evidence from a child complainant, the judge may conduct a substantial further examination provided the questions are asked in a neutral way and the judge does not fall into the perils of self-persuasion. The test is whether the judicial questioning created a real danger that the trial was unfair.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.