For limitation extension applications under s 31(2)(a) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) in industrial deafness cases, a worker's general awareness of some hearing loss does not constitute knowledge of a material fact of decisive character where the worker was not informed of the extent of deterioration, was not referred to a doctor, and reasonably believed protective equipment was adequate. The material fact of decisive character includes knowledge that the loss is of such extent and occurred in such circumstances as to show reasonable prospects of success in an action. The case also reaffirms that magistrates must give adequate reasons disclosing findings of fact and reasoning, and that vague general statements or unexplained conclusions are insufficient.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.