Psychological conditions falling short of psychiatric illness, while relevant mitigating factors, do not necessarily justify mitigation of general deterrence. A sentencing judge's assessment that such factors have limited weight in reducing moral culpability is open on the evidence. Significant differences in culpability, age, remorse, and rehabilitation prospects between co-offenders can justify immediate imprisonment for one and a wholly suspended sentence for the other without infringing the parity principle.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.