The totality principle does not justify making sentences entirely concurrent with existing sentences where doing so effectively leaves the offender unpunished for serious offending. A sentencing court must balance the subjective effect of cumulative sentences on the offender against the need for the aggregate sentence to reflect total criminality and serve deterrence. Where a cumulative sentence would not be 'crushing', the totality principle does not warrant concurrent sentences that negate punishment for distinct offending.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.