Regina v Ngo

[2005] NSWCCA 107

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Periodic detention
4. › Two-step sentencing process
5. › Whether sentencing judge erred by telescoping determination of appropriate imprisonment term with decision to order periodic detention
6. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 44, 45
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Non-parole period
4. › Failure to set non-parole period
5. › Whether adequate reasons given for declining to fix non-parole period
6. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 44, 45
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Malicious wounding
4. › Appropriate starting point for head sentence
5. › Discount for early plea of guilty and subjective circumstances
6. › Whether sentence manifestly excessive
7. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 35(1)(a)

Quick Take

A sentencing judge ordering periodic detention must first fix an appropriate period of imprisonment reflecting objective criminality and subjective circumstances (including any discount for an early plea of guilty), and only then consider whether the sentence should be served by way of periodic detention. The two considerations must not be telescoped, and it is impermissible to extend the term of imprisonment to compensate for the perceived leniency of periodic detention.