Where a sentencing judge imposes identical sentences on multiple counts involving substantially different amounts, the sentencing discretion is vitiated for failure to observe the principle of proportionality — sentences must bear a rational relationship to the crime. A significant factual error as to the amount voluntarily repaid by an offender similarly vitiates the sentencing discretion. A sentencing judge's discretion is not irrevocably fettered by a prior sentence imposed in another jurisdiction for similar offending.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.