A finding that a sentence of imprisonment is manifestly inadequate re-opens the entire sentencing discretion, including the question of suspension, but the appellate court may in the exercise of its overriding discretion decline to disturb a total suspension order where no error in principle has been demonstrated in that order and significant rehabilitation has occurred since sentence. The passage of time, burden of pending appeal, and continued rehabilitation are relevant factors on re-sentencing that may justify total suspension of an increased sentence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.