An injury caused by a truck door blown shut by wind striking a person is not an 'injury' within the MAC Act because the effective or proximate cause is the negligence of an employee in failing to secure the door, not a 'collision with' the motor vehicle. The word 'collision' in the definition of 'injury' must be construed by reference to the scope, objects and purposes of the MAC Act, not merely by dictionary definition. The causal requirement in the definition looks to proximate cause in the insurance law sense — the effective or direct cause — not common law causation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 15 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.