› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
› CIRCUMSTANCES NOT INVOLVING MISCARRIAGE OR IN WHICH MISCARRIAGE NOT SUBSTANTIAL
› OTHER IRREGULARITIES
› whether the verdicts were inconsistent and rendered the convictions unsafe and unsound
Criminal Law
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
› CIRCUMSTANCES NOT INVOLVING MISCARRIAGE OR IN WHICH MISCARRIAGE NOT SUBSTANTIAL
› OTHER IRREGULARITIES
› whether the decision by the appellant/applicant’s counsel during the trial not to recall certain witnesses and not call other witnesses deprived the appellant/applicant of a defence
Criminal Law
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
› CIRCUMSTANCES NOT INVOLVING MISCARRIAGE OR IN WHICH MISCARRIAGE NOT SUBSTANTIAL
› OTHER IRREGULARITIES
› where some jurors had seen the appellant/applicant wearing handcuffs during an adjournment
› trial judge directed jury not to draw an adverse inference from this
› trial judge refused to discharge the jury
› whether trial judge should have discharged the jury
Criminal Law
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
› APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL
› MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
› CIRCUMSTANCES NOT INVOLVING MISCARRIAGE OR IN WHICH MISCARRIAGE NOT SUBSTANTIAL
› OTHER IRREGULARITIES
› during trial defence counsel complained about sleeping jurors and facial expressions of trial judge
› trial judge directed jury to focus on evidence
› whether trial judge erred in not discharging the jury
Case Details
Citation[2006] QCA 409
CourtQCA
JurisdictionQueensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 55 later cases that cite this judgment.
33 of the 55 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
