A trial judge may not expand the Crown case in the charge to the jury by directing on alternative bases of liability (such as joint enterprise or common design) that the Crown did not advance and the defence was not called upon to meet. Where such expansion occurs after the close of evidence and addresses, it constitutes a fundamental irregularity going to the root of the proceedings that cannot be cured by the proviso, regardless of the strength of the Crown case.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.