A preliminary expert report based on incomplete information provided by the accused, where the expert has not examined any items and the factual basis is not detailed, is not capable of meeting the threshold for admission as additional evidence on appeal. Where additional evidence could reasonably have been obtained before trial, it is 'new' rather than 'fresh' evidence and must be capable of satisfying the court of the applicant's innocence or raising such a doubt that the applicant should not have been convicted.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.