A good character direction need not treat the accused as being of 'otherwise' good character where the accused's own defence reveals conduct undermining that character. Where an accused's defence is that he or she believed they were committing a different (but still criminal) offence, that defence is relevant to the jury's assessment of character and may properly be referred to in the good character direction. A trial judge may also properly decline to give a good character direction in such circumstances.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.