Persistence in plainly untenable claims on appeal, where the claims were wholly without arguable merit and contradicted by contemporary documents, warrants an award of indemnity costs. The lodging of a second caveat on the same grounds after removal of the first may suggest ulterior motive supporting indemnity costs.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 18 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.