A manufacturer who supplies a partially completed machine owes a duty to advise the person completing manufacture about safety features necessary to guard against foreseeable risk of injury, even where the risk is obvious. The obviousness of risk is relevant to the standard of care, not the existence of the duty. Where a manufacturer's breach increases the risk of the type of injury that occurs, the evidentiary onus shifts to the manufacturer to point to evidence suggesting no causal connection, and a finding that the plaintiff would have circumvented safety measures cannot be made where that proposition was never put to the plaintiff in cross-examination. A professional capacity exclusion in a product liability policy is limited to claims by persons who retained the insured, and does not extend to third-party claims arising from negligent manufacture.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 24 later cases that cite this judgment.
6 of the 24 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.