Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Chao v Chao [2008] NSWSC 584 — Admissibility Of Evidence — Barrister AI

Chao v Chao

[2008] NSWSC 584

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility of evidence
3. › where evidence being adduced is a transcript of a recorded telephone conversation
4. › where recording made by holding tape recorder to speaker - (CTH) Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
5. › whether recorded conversation is an interception of communication passing over a telecommunications system
6. › whether recorded conversation had become accessible to the intended recipient of the communication.
1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility of evidence
3. › where evidence being adduced is a transcript of a recorded telephone conversation
4. › (NSW) Listening Devices Act 1984
5. › whether recorded conversation obtained unlawfully
6. › whether recorded conversation had become known to the party only through use of the listening device
7. › whether use of the listening device was reasonably necessary for the protection of the lawful interests of principal party by whom it was recorded.

Case Details

Citation[2008] NSWSC 584

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 19 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 19 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by19

2021Kanjian Holdings No 1 Pty Ltd v Kanjian; Kanjian v Kanjian (No 3)NSWSC 839
2020Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v The Country Care Group Pty Ltd (Ruling No 5)FCA 1825
2020Rathswohl v CourtNSWSC 1490
2019R v EpACTSC 89
and 15 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works