Mann v Tasmania

[2008] TASSC 34

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal and new trial and inquiry after conviction
3. › Appeal and new trial
4. › Particular grounds
5. › Fresh evidence
6. › Availability at trial; materiality and cogency
7. › Particular cases
8. › Availability at trial
9. › Evidence contradicting principal prosecution witness.
1. Criminal Code 1924 (Tas), ss402(1)(2), 409(1)(c).
1. Howson v R [2007] WASCA 83; (2007) 170 A Crim R 401; R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; (2004) 149 A Crim R 417; Ratten v R [1974] HCA 35; (1974) 131 CLR 510; Gallagher v R [1986] HCA 26; (1986) 160 CLR 392, referred to.
1. Aust Dig Criminal Law [989]

Citation[2008] TASSC 34

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in