Obieta v Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal NSW

[2009] NSWCA 220

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › Statutory appeal
3. › Appeal from tribunal decision
4. › Limited to decision on question of law
5. › Distinction between erroneous decision on law and procedural error in determination
6. › Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW), ss 65, 67
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Parties
3. › Removal of party
4. › Whether tribunal proper party to statutory appeal from its own decision
5. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 6.29
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Application for stay pending leave application
3. › Whether application had reasonable prospects of success
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Jurisdiction of District Court
3. › Whether District Court has power to grant relief by way of judicial review
4. › Bifurcated jurisdiction following transfer of statutory appeals from Supreme Court to District Court
5. › Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW), s 67
6. › Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69

Quick Take

The District Court does not possess judicial review jurisdiction over CTTT decisions. Where a party seeks relief for procedural unfairness or jurisdictional error by the CTTT that does not constitute a 'decision on a question of law' within s 67 of the CTTT Act, that party must invoke the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), creating a bifurcated jurisdiction. The CTTT is not a proper party to a statutory appeal from its own decision in the District Court.