Bingul v Regina

[2009] NSWCCA 239

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. EVIDENCE - admissibility and relevancy
2. › tendency evidence
3. › global objection to tendency evidence on basis of prejudice
4. › no requirement that trial judge examine each piece of evidence individually when counsel did not deal with the objection in that fashion
1. EVIDENCE - admissibility and relevancy
2. › tendency evidence
3. › jury directions
4. › adequacy of directions of what use could be made of tendency evidence
5. › adequacy of directions in relation to other criminal activity and bad character
1. Criminal Law
2. › appeal against sentencing
3. › factors against leniency - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A
4. › effect of offences committed after offence under sentencing
5. › drug offences - totals accumulated to get to commercial quantity from separate supplies
6. › whether sentence manifestly excessive
7. › leave to appeal granted
8. › appeal dismissed
1. Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
2. › s 21A

Citation[2009] NSWCCA 239

CourtNSWCCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in