Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Nemeth v Prynew Piling v Prynew [2009] NSWSC 511 — Barrister AI

Nemeth v Prynew Piling v Prynew

[2009] NSWSC 511

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Costs. Calderbank offers by two of three defendants. Consideration of timing, form and whether it was reasonable to have rejected offers. Held it was reasonable.

Case Details

Citation[2009] NSWSC 511

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2023Classics for a Cause Pty Ltd v Grays Ecommerce Group Ltd (No 2)NSWSC 1206
2023CIMIC Group Limited v AIG Australia Limited (No 2)NSWSC 640
2012Tsu v Nemeth & AnorNSWCA 29
2010Permanent Custodians Limited and Anor v King and OrsNSWSC 509
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on26

2008Commonwealth of Australia v GrettonNSWCA 117
2008County Securities Pty Limited v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Limited (No 2)NSWCA 273
2008Piling v Prynew Nemeth v PrynewNSWSC 327
2008Reinhold v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation (No 2)NSWSC 187
and 22 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works