Where a plaintiff seeks to amend to add a new cause of action after the limitation period has expired, the fact that the new claim arises under the same contract as the existing claims is insufficient to satisfy r 376(4)(b) UCPR. The 'substantially the same facts' requirement demands that the specific acts or omissions founding the new cause of action, and the resulting loss, were already pleaded or at least foreshadowed in the existing pleading.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 10 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 10 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.