A sentencing judge's reliance on comparable cases that are far more serious than the offending before the court may demonstrate that the sentencing discretion has miscarried, even though one should not readily conclude that reference to such cases is productive of appellable error. For attempted armed robbery with a syringe (without blood-filled syringe or actual violence), a head sentence in the range of four years imprisonment was appropriate where the offender had an extensive criminal history and offended while on bail.
The full text is available to signed-in members.