The discretion under r 64.16(2) to relieve against deemed abandonment of an appeal is broad and unfettered, but the fact that an appeal is not utterly devoid of merit does not compel the making of such an order. Persistent and blameworthy disobedience of court orders, prejudice to the respondent, and the need for even-handed justice may overwhelm considerations favouring the appellant, including that the appeal has arguable merit and security for costs has been given.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.