Where a contract requires an expert to give reasons for a determination, the minimum standard requires the basic ground for decision to be identifiable. Internal inconsistency in findings on a common factual question renders the determination non-compliant with the contractual obligation to give reasons, and the determination is not binding on the parties. The standard of reasons required of a contractually appointed expert is to be determined by reference to the contract, not by analogy with arbitrators or referees.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 87 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 87 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.