The M v The Queen test for unreasonable verdict was applied to a case involving conflicting photographic identification evidence. Where two witnesses positively identified the accused from a digiboard, two identified another person, and a defence witness claimed responsibility, the verdict was upheld because the descriptions given by all witnesses matched the accused and the jury was entitled to reject the defence evidence as lacking credibility.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.