A routine application of established principles governing leave to appeal against conviction. The case confirms that a defence of mistake of fact under s 24 of the Criminal Code (WA) cannot be left to the jury where there is no evidence capable of supporting the reasonableness of the alleged mistaken belief, and that difficulties experienced by a self-represented accused in custody during trial do not ordinarily give rise to a miscarriage of justice.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.