Where an accused is acquitted of rape but convicted of indecent dealing arising from the same incident, the verdicts are not necessarily inconsistent if the element of consent (required for rape but not indecent dealing) provides a rational basis for the different outcomes. The absence of evidence of physical resistance or verbal protest does not preclude a finding of absence of consent, particularly where the complainant is a young person subject to the authority of the accused.
The full text is available to signed-in members.