Where aggravated burglary and armed robbery arise from a single course of conduct and the same aggravating features apply to both offences, the sentences must reflect different levels of criminality to avoid double punishment; imposing sentences of the same order for both is impermissible. The obligation under s 5(2)(b) of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) to have regard to current sentencing practices does not mean being 'constrained by' those practices in the sense of being bound by statistical medians and means; it is one unweighted factor in the exercise of intuitive synthesis.
The full text is available to signed-in members.