An appeal to the Court of Appeal from an interlocutory decision of the Appeal Panel of the ADT under s 119(1A) of the ADT Act requires identification of a question of law; unparticularised complaints of bias or procedural unfairness are insufficient. The statutory definition of 'interlocutory function' in s 24A of the ADT Act may not control the meaning of 'interlocutory decision' in s 119(1A), though this question was left open.
The full text is available to signed-in members.