A straightforward refusal of leave to appeal from findings of fact on causation in a school negligence case. The decision confirms that an applicant must demonstrate more than bare assertion to show that factual findings were reasonably arguably wrong, particularly where the primary judge's findings were supported by photographic and corroborative oral evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.