Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Barel v Segal (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1054 — Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(4) — Barrister AI

Barel v Segal (No 2)

[2012] NSWSC 1054

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(4) - "more beneficial" - not solely referable to comparative economic benefit
1. CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(4) - exercise of discretion - planning issues capable of being resolved under process set out in Section 66G(5) do not prevent order under Section 66G(4)
1. CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66F(3) - "equality money" - meaning and purpose - no application to facts
1. CONVEYANCING - co-owners of property - "occupation fee" - meaning and purpose - only available where one co-owner is in sole occupation

Case Details

Citation[2012] NSWSC 1054

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2016Commonwealth Bank of Australia v SegalNSWSC 1016
2015Christopher Mel Chamberlain trading in his capacity as liquidator of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (in liq) (ACN 000342174) v Felicity CassegrainNSWSC 1838
2013Segal v Barel (No 2)NSWCA 148
2013Segal v BarelNSWCA 92

Relies on12

2012Cordon Investments Pty Ltd v Lesdor Properties Pty LtdNSWCA 184
2012Shannon (in his capacity as receiver and manager of North East Wiradjuri Co Limited) v North East Wiradjuri Co Limited (No 3)FCA 106
2011Elie Barel v Phillip SegalNSWSC 1181
2011Mark Gerard Ireland as Executor of the Estate of the late Charles Stuart Gordon v Sandra Jane Retallack & Ors (No 2)NSWSC 1096
and 8 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works