An apology or statement by an accused need not be unambiguous and unequivocal to be admissible as an admission against interest; it is sufficient that the words are reasonably capable of being construed as an admission, with the jury determining whether they constitute an admission and what weight to give them. R v PV; ex parte A-G (Qld) does not impose a higher threshold for admissibility.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
8 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.