The mere fact that jurors become aware an accused is in custody during trial is unlikely to be sufficiently prejudicial to require discharge of the jury, absent knowledge that the custody relates to prior offending or specific bad character. In assessing the prejudicial impact of unresponsive evidence, the court will consider the witness's comprehensibility, the context of the evidence, and the availability of other evidence supporting conviction.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.