A conditionally suspended sentence for possession of 26.6g of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply is manifestly inadequate where the mitigating factors (youth, good character, Aboriginal background, employment, rehabilitation) are not uncommon and are properly reflected in the length of the sentence rather than its suspension. Sentencing judges should ordinarily require a trial of issues where there is a material inconsistency between objective facts and mitigating factors asserted on behalf of the offender.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.