Roncevic v WA

[2012] WASCA 43

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Appeal against sentence
4. › Whether individual sentences manifestly excessive
5. › Assault on public officer while armed with firearm
6. › Criminal Code (WA), s 381(1)(d)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Totality principle
4. › Whether total effective sentence bears proper relationship to overall criminality
5. › One transaction rule
6. › Whether cumulative sentences appropriate for offences committed in one episode
7. › Sentencing Act 1995 (WA), s 6(1)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal
3. › Application for extension of time
4. › Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), s 31(4)(a)

Quick Take

The one transaction rule does not preclude cumulative sentences for offences committed in a single episode, and even where cumulative sentences for offences within one transaction may have been inappropriate, the appeal will be dismissed if the total effective sentence properly reflects overall criminality. The absence of physical injury to a victim of assault is merely the absence of an aggravating factor, not a mitigating factor. Psychological harm to victims of firearm-related assaults may have consequences potentially greater than physical injury.